Microsoft Certified: Azure Fundamentals
Azure Fundamentals establishes that you understand what cloud computing is, what Microsoft sells, and roughly what it costs. Forty-five minutes, no prerequisite, and once passed it never expires.
Among Microsoft's five foundational papers, this is the single one we would pay for unprompted.
Exam facts
- Exam code
- AZ-900
- Level
- Foundational
- Field
- Cloud
- Duration
- 45 minutes
- Questions
- about 40 to 60 (Microsoft does not publish a fixed number)
- Passing score
- 700 of 1,000 (scaled)
- Languages
- English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Arabic, Indonesian, Russian
- Price
- 99 USD (read 8 September 2026)
- Validity
- never expires
- Exam delivery
- Pearson VUE (test centre or online proctored); students through Certiport
Prerequisites: None. Microsoft suggests general familiarity with IT — infrastructure, databases or software development — but no prior certification.
Source: exam page at Microsoft · Price: Priced by the country where the exam is proctored: 99 USD in the United States, 76 EUR in Germany and Austria (Microsoft Learn country selector); the exam page shows your local price
How to prepare
1. The vendor's free learning path
Microsoft publishes the exam objectives and a learning path free of charge — the authoritative source for scope and weighting. Open the learning path (opens in a new tab)
2. Online courses
Courses and practice questions from the directory that target exactly this exam — details, price and the provider link (affiliate) are on the course page.
- Preparation courseAZ-900: Microsoft Azure Fundamentals Certification - 2025
- Preparation courseAZ-900: Microsoft Azure Fundamentals Exam Prep -2025 Edition
- Preparation courseMicrosoft Azure - Beginner's Guide + AZ-900 preparation
- Practice testsAZ-900: Microsoft Azure Fundamentals Original Practice Tests
- Practice testsAZ-900 Azure Certification:- 5 Complete Practice Exams
3. A practice test in the exam format
MeasureUp sells a practice test for AZ-900 with questions in the exam format, an explanation for every answer and a timed mode; the price shows in your currency on the shop page. Affiliate link.
Practice test for AZ-900 at MeasureUp (opens in a new tab)Book the exam
Delivered by Pearson VUE (test centre or online proctored); students through Certiport. Schedule with Microsoft (opens in a new tab)
Affiliate disclosure: the course and practice-test links above are affiliate links — buying through them may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you. The vendor's learning path and booking links carry no commission.
The reason is scope. The other fundamentals papers describe a product family; this one describes the model underneath all of them. Shared responsibility, regions and availability zones, the difference between renting a machine and renting a service, and why the bill arrives shaped the way it does are ideas that outlast any particular portal redesign. A reader who absorbs them can follow an architecture conversation in a way that memorising service names never achieves.
- Non-technical roles near cloud decisions. Procurement, finance, project management and sales. The vocabulary is the deliverable and this is the fastest honest route to it.
- Career changers wanting proof of a start. A permanent certificate for a modest fee is a reasonable first marker, provided something else follows it.
- Teams being migrated onto Azure. Shared vocabulary before a migration saves more meetings than it costs.
- Not seasoned engineers. Anyone already administering systems will find this retreads familiar ground, and the associate paper is what gets read as evidence.
Never expiring cuts both ways
There is no renewal, no fee cycle and nothing to diarise, which is genuinely pleasant and unusual on this site. The other edge is that a certificate passed years ago proves only that you once knew a platform that has changed considerably since. Nobody reading a CV can tell the difference between a recent pass and an ancient one unless you state the year, so state the year. The role-based certificates above this one take the opposite approach and expire annually, which is why holders of both end up managing one deadline rather than none.
| Aspect | Azure Fundamentals (AZ-900) | AWS Cloud Practitioner (CLF-C02) |
|---|---|---|
| Time | 45 minutes | 90 minutes |
| Questions | A range Microsoft does not fix | 65, of which 15 unscored |
| Pass mark | 700 of 1,000 | 700 of 1,000 |
| Expiry | Never | Three years |
| Renewal | None needed | Resit, a higher exam, or a free game |
| German edition | Yes | Ending after 31 December 2026 |
| Fee | Set by country of sitting | One global figure |
Set against its AWS twin the differences are all in the upkeep column, and they run in this paper's favour: half the sitting time, no expiry, and a German edition that is staying. What the two share is the audience and the ambition. Neither will get an engineer hired, both will get a procurement lead through a cloud conversation without nodding at words they cannot define, and a second badge at this tier adds almost nothing to the first. Choose by the platform that is actually in the building.
Spend the fee's worth of time in a free account before you book
Create a resource group, put a virtual machine and a storage account in it, look at the cost estimate before you confirm, then delete everything and watch what the bill shows the next day. That afternoon covers shared responsibility, regions, the compute-against-service distinction and pricing in the only way that sticks, and the exam's scenario questions read very differently once you have seen the screens they describe.
What sits around it
Microsoft publishes five foundational papers, and this is the one about the platform rather than about a product family on it: the security, data, AI and business-applications fundamentals each assume the ground this one covers. Above it sits the administrator certificate, which requires nothing first and is what technical candidates should book instead. Forty-five minutes at a Pearson VUE centre, 700 scaled to pass, a dozen editions with German among them, a fee that depends on where you sit, and nothing required beforehand. Microsoft suggests general familiarity with IT in some form, which describes the reader this paper serves best.
What a question looks like
Written by us in the exam's style. It is not a real question from any question bank, and we do not publish those.
A company wants to move an application off its own hardware. It needs to keep control of the operating system and the software installed on it, while no longer owning or replacing servers. Which service model matches that requirement?
It is not hard for an engineer and it is genuinely hard for the audience this exam serves. The distinction between the three service models is the single idea the paper cares about most, and it is tested by describing a situation in business language rather than naming the model. Candidates who memorised three definitions can still miss which one keeps the operating system in the customer's hands.
What it costs to get and to keep
| Item | Amount | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Exam fee | 99 USD | set by the country where the exam is proctored rather than by a single global list, so the figure moves with where you sit it (read 12 September 2026) |
| Exam fee, Germany and Austria | 76 EUR | read from the Microsoft Learn country selector, which is where regional prices actually live (read 8 September 2026) |
| Renewal | not published | there is none. The certificate does not expire and Microsoft asks nothing further once you hold it (read 12 September 2026) |
How much preparation, from where you are
- You work alongside a cloud team without building
- The intended reader, and the material responds well to reading rather than practice. Microsoft's own free learning path covers the syllabus, and the part that surprises people is pricing and governance rather than anything technical.
- You administer servers somewhere else
- Most of this will be familiar wearing different names. The useful study is the commercial half: support plans, cost tooling and the governance vocabulary, which rarely overlaps with on-premise experience.
What passing this does not prove
- Any ability to configure Azure. The exam never asks you to open the portal.
- Cost control as practised, only the names of the tools that support it.
- Whether you could size or secure a deployment, which is where the associate tier starts.
- Anything about how Azure behaves when something breaks.
Against the alternatives
- CLF-C02 — AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner
- The AWS counterpart, matched almost step for step in scope and audience. Choose by the platform around you, and note that the AWS version expires after three years where this one does not.
- AZ-104 — Microsoft Certified: Azure Administrator Associate
- Where anyone technical should go instead. It is not gated behind this paper, it costs more, and it is the one an employer reads as evidence you can run something.
- SC-900 — Microsoft Certified: Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals
- The same tier for security and compliance vocabulary. Worth holding alongside this only if compliance conversations are actually part of your work.
AZ-900 — quick answers
Do I need it before AZ-104?
No. Microsoft imposes no prerequisite between the fundamentals and associate tiers, and technical candidates routinely start at the associate exam. Sit this one first only if you want a gentle introduction or somebody else is counting certificates.
Is 45 minutes enough?
Comfortably, for most candidates. The exam is shorter than the role-based papers because the questions are shorter, and running out of time is rare. No fixed question count is published for this paper, so plan for a spread.
Does it help without experience?
It helps you talk about the field and it will not get you hired into it. Treat it as the first of several things on a CV rather than the qualification itself, and pair it with something you have actually deployed, even in a free account.
Which of the five fundamentals papers first?
This one, unless your job is specifically about security, data, AI or the business applications. It describes the platform the other four run on, and a reader who understands regions, responsibility and pricing finds the product-specific papers half-familiar before opening them.
Azure or AWS fundamentals, if the company runs both?
Whichever the conversations you are in keep mentioning. The two certify the same literacy; this one is shorter and permanent, the AWS paper is longer and expires. If the answer is genuinely both, sit this one first for the time saved, and treat the second as optional.
What comes next
- Microsoft · AZ-104Microsoft Certified: Azure Administrator Associate
- Microsoft · SC-900Microsoft Certified: Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals
- Microsoft · DP-900Microsoft Certified: Azure Data Fundamentals
- Microsoft · PL-900Microsoft Certified: Power Platform Fundamentals
- Microsoft · AI-901Microsoft Certified: Azure AI Fundamentals
- AWS · CLF-C02AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner
- CompTIA · FC0-U71CompTIA Tech+
- CompTIA · CV0-004CompTIA Cloud+
- PeopleCert · ITIL Foundation V5ITIL Foundation (Version 5)
- GitHub · GH-900GitHub Foundations
Concepts this exam draws on
Glossary entries with the reason each one matters for AZ-900.
- Cloud Hosting
Cloud concepts are the first third of AZ-900.
- IaaS
The service models are tested as definitions and examples.
- PaaS
Azure App Service as the platform example.
- Serverless Computing
Azure Functions as the serverless example.
- IAM
The fundamentals paper introduces Entra, roles and the shared-responsibility line at vocabulary depth.
Last reviewed 12 September 2026 · Getting Digital
